Ecosyste.ms: Advisories

An open API service providing security vulnerability metadata for many open source software ecosystems.

Security Advisories: GSA_kwCzR0hTQS1nODV2LXdmMjctNjd4Y84ABBec

Harden-Runner has a command injection weaknesses in `setup.ts` and `arc-runner.ts`

Summary

Versions of step-security/harden-runner prior to v2.10.2 contain multiple command injection weaknesses via environment variables that could potentially be exploited under specific conditions. However, due to the current execution order of pre-steps in GitHub Actions and the placement of harden-runner as the first step in a job, the likelihood of exploitation is low as the Harden-Runner action reads the environment variable during the pre-step stage. There are no known exploits at this time.

Details

  1. setup.ts:169 1 performs execSync with a command that gets
    invoked after interpretation by the shell. This command includes an
    interpolated process.env.USER variable, which an attacker could
    modify (without actually creating a new user) to inject arbitrary
    shell expressions into this execSync. This may or may not be likely
    in practice, but I believe the hygienic way to perform the underlying
    operation is to use execFileSync or similar and bypass the
    underlying shell evaluation.

  2. setup.ts:229 2 has a nearly identical execSync to (1) above,
    but with $USER for shell-level interpolation rather than string
    interpolation. However, this is still injectable and would be best
    replaced by an execFileSync, per above.

  3. arc-runner:40-44 3 has an execSync with multiple string
    interpolations. Most of these do not appear immediately injectible
    (since they appear to come from presumed trusted API responses), but
    the expansion of getRunnerTempDir() may be injectable due to its
    dependence on potentially attacker-controllable environment variables
    (e.g. RUNNER_TEMP). The underlying operation appears to be a trivial
    file copy, so this entire subprocess should in theory be replaceable
    with ordinary NodeJS fs API calls instead.

  4. arc-runner:53 4 demonstrates the same weakness, and has the same
    resolution as (3).

  5. arc-runner:57 demonstrates the same weakness as (3) and (4), and
    has the same resolution.

  6. arc-runner:61 demonstrates the same weakness as (3), (4), and (5),
    and has the same resolution.

Permalink: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g85v-wf27-67xc
JSON: https://advisories.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/advisories/GSA_kwCzR0hTQS1nODV2LXdmMjctNjd4Y84ABBec
Source: GitHub Advisory Database
Origin: Unspecified
Severity: Low
Classification: General
Published: about 1 month ago
Updated: about 1 month ago


CVSS Score: 8.8
CVSS vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS Percentage: 0.00046
EPSS Percentile: 0.17505

Identifiers: GHSA-g85v-wf27-67xc, CVE-2024-52587
References: Repository: https://github.com/step-security/harden-runner
Blast Radius: 1.0

Affected Packages

actions:step-security/harden-runner
Affected Version Ranges: < 2.10.2
Fixed in: 2.10.2